[ad_1]
President Donald Trump unveiled details of his administration’s long-stalled plan for peace between Israelis and Palestinians on Tuesday, though the proposal’s critics warned before its release it has little chance of success because of its pro-Israel slant.
Trump’s plan is intended to defuse decades of hostilities between Israelis and Palestinians. In a surprise move, the initiative called for a “two-state” solution – an independent Palestine sitting alongside Israel sharing a capital of East Jerusalem. A “two-state” solution has been a hallmark of Israeli-Palestinian peace initiatives for years, but before the plan’s release, there was speculation Trump might omit it.
Details about the initiative’s economic proposals, including $50 billion in infrastructure spending and investment over 10 years for the Palestinian territories and neighbors Jordan, Egypt and Lebanon, have been previously announced.
The plan’s political aspects have been a closely guarded secret. Its release, after three years in the making, comes as Trump hosted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his chief political rival, Benny Gantz, at the White House to discuss the plan. It was not clear whether an invitation was extended to Palestinian leaders.
Peace plan? Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s grandmother has some words for Donald Trump
Trump described his plan as a “historic breakthrough” and said he wrote to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, saying territory set aside for the Palestinian state would remain open for a “transition” period of four years in what amounts to a freeze in Israeli settlement construction.
He said the deal, outlined in an 80-page document, was a “win-win” for Israelis and Palestinians. The plan would more than double the territory under Palestinian control. It recognizes Israeli sovereignty over major settlement blocs in the West Bank, a scenario many Palestinians will find difficult to accept. The plan would limit Palestinians to specific parts of East Jerusalem and leave Israel in sole charge of holy sites that are sacred to both sides.
“After the nonsense we heard today, we say a thousand no’s,” Abbas said of the deal.
Netanyahu said Israel owes Trump an “eternal debt of gratitude.” He said Trump is the greatest friend Israel has ever had in the White House. Shortly after the announcement, he asked his Cabinet to endorse a plan to annex parts of the West Bank.
“While Trump claims a revolutionary approach to the peace process, this plan actually recycles past failed efforts: It places Palestinians on probation while they prove their worthiness of statehood, using conditions that are malleable and ill-defined; it seeks to induce Palestinian capitulation through economic largesse; and it removes the onus on IsraeI to make any concessions until Palestinians declare their full surrender,” said Tareq Baconi, a Middle East expert at International Crisis Group, a think tank.
The peace plan was spearheaded by Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, White House adviser Avi Berkowitz, former Middle East envoy Jason Greenblatt and David Friedman, the U.S. ambassador to Israel. All four men have deep religious and educational ties to Israel – factors that undermined their legitimacy as honest brokers in the eyes of many Palestinians.
This ” ‘peace’ plan ignores the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people and thus will continue to perpetuate the conflict,” said Yousef Jabareen, an Arab Israeli member of Israel’s Knesset, or Parliament. Estimates vary, but about 1.84 million Arabs live in Israel, according to Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics. An additional 5 million live in Israeli-occupied territories in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Attempts to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have stagnated for years despite high-profile and rigorous American-brokered attempts at diplomacy.
Trump’s plan was delayed in part by back-to-back elections in Israel last year that left Netanyahu in a virtual tie with Gantz, neither able to cobble together a ruling coalition. A third election is planned for early March. The deadlock was deepened by Netanyahu’s indictment on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust. Netanyahu pulled a request for immunity from prosecution over these charges hours before parliamentary proceedings over the issue were set to begin in Israel on Tuesday.
Netanyahu denied any wrongdoing.
‘It’s a great plan’:Trump to release peace proposal before meeting with Israeli leaders
There are different views about what caused previous peace efforts to fail.
There is divergence over what the peace process correctly entails. At its core, it’s a dispute – one of the world’s longest-running – over ancient land that two peoples, Jews and Arab Palestinians, lay claim to for their respective states.
The war that Israel fought in 1967 with neighboring Egypt, Jordan and Syria ended with Israel in military control of two areas that have large Palestinian populations: the West Bank, nestled between Israel to the west and the Jordan Valley to the east, and the Gaza Strip, an isolated enclave on the Mediterranean Sea controlled by the Hamas militant group.
Israel imposed a sea blockade and built a security fence around Gaza, where militants have launched thousands of rocket and mortar attacks on Israel. Hamas, which the U.S. State Department designated a terrorist organization, has fought several wars with Israel, most recently in 2014. Sporadic fighting resumed in May last year but ended relatively quickly in informal truces.
Palestinians branded Trump’s plan – dismissively, because of his real estate roots – as the “Deal of the Century.” Trump has also used variations on this phrase to describe it. Before the announcement, Trump said Palestinians might react negatively to his plan at first, but “it’s actually very positive for them.”
Trump said, “It’s a great plan, a plan that really would work.”
He said Tuesday it has been “a long and very arduous process to arrive at this moment.”
Officials from the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain attended the plan’s release at the White House along with senior Israeli officials and U.S. diplomats. Jordan warned against “annexation of Palestinian lands.”
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said in a tweet that Trump’s “one-sided” peace plan is “delusional hyperbole over reality.”
Every American president in modern times, citing shared history and values and an unshakable security commitment, has been pro-Israel.
Trump has undertaken a series of firmly pro-Israel actions that include moving the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, which Palestinians claim as part of their future capital; recognizing the Golan Heights as belonging to Israel instead of Syria, in defiance of international law; and pulling the United States out of the 2015 landmark Iran nuclear deal with world powers, an accord that Israel, Iran’s sworn enemy, firmly opposed.
The Trump administration backed the expansion of Israeli Jewish settlements, no longer viewing them as illegal under international law, closed a Palestinian diplomatic office in Washington – the Palestinians’ de facto embassy – and withdrawn all funding for Palestinian-related aid projects, including those focused on water resources and schools.
“We have had no better friend than President Trump,” Netanyahu said before the plan’s release. “With this (White House) invitation, I think that the president is seeking to give Israel the peace and security that it deserves.”
Last year, Netanyahu, in a sign of his government’s appreciation, inaugurated a planned Israeli community named “Ramat Trump” in Hebrew, or “Trump Heights,” in the Golan Heights about 12 miles from Syria’s border.
Israel settlements:Donald Trump proves he’s the ‘King of Israel’
“Most Israeli Jews welcome (Trump’s peace plan), said Moshe Maoz, a Middle East expert at Hebrew University, in Jerusalem. “Particularly Netanyahu, who hopes that this would help him to do away with his indictments.”
Susie Gelman, chair of the Israel Policy Forum, a New York-based American Jewish organization that works for a negotiated two-state solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, said Trump’s plan will “provide the Israeli government with the excuse to proceed with unilateral moves such as annexing parts of the West Bank.” She said this would “place the future of Israeli-Palestinian peace in great jeopardy, thereby posing a serious risk to Israeli security and to Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state.”
Michael Makovsky, president and CEO of the Jewish Institute for National Security of America, a Washington-based pro-Israel think tank, said it is important that Trump is following through on his promise to release the plan.
“What matters is the substance: It’s long past time that the U.S. introduce new parameters, ones that are more realistic than past efforts, that have hopefully learned the lessons of past failures and can form the foundation of a successful effort,” Makovsky said.
Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., praised Trump’s plan, saying it “provided a path to new negotiations and a lasting peace that preserves the Jewish state of Israel and provides a path for a recognized Palestinian state.”
Of the lack of Palestinian participation in the peace plan, Friedman, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, said, “We recognize they’re not at the table,” but they have four years to decide if they want to pursue this. “This is not take it or leave it. … It’s there for the taking.”
Palestinians reacted negatively to the announcement.
“A reminder to the international community: Israel is an occupying power on the state of Palestine,” Saeb Erekat, a Palestinian diplomat, said in a WhatsApp message before the plan’s release. “Any deal … that ignores this fact, will be recorded in history as the ‘Fraud of the Century.’ ”
Mustafa Barghouti, a former Palestinian lawmaker and onetime presidential candidate, said, “It is a very bad plan for peace. It will … consolidate a system of Israeli apartheid against Palestinians. That’s not sustainable.”
Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh denounced the proposal as a violation of international law that “comes from a party that has lost its credibility to be an honest broker in a serious and genuine political process.”
Contributing: Deirdre Shesgreen, Courtney Subramanian
[ad_2]
Source link
